

| Efficacy of Vaccines How Effective Are Vaccines? It is so common to hear that vaccines are effective. This is rarely questioned by anything mainstream. I’m always curious to understand what constitutes a vaccine as being effective. What markers do they use to determine if a vaccine is effective? The basic premise is that a small piece of viral matter (an antigen) injected into the body via a vaccine will elicit an immune response, producing antibodies, and then a person should be immune should the body encounter the illness again. Blood levels of antibodies called titers can then be drawn. You are thought to be immune if your antibodies are over a predetermined level. Titers are not checked very often, however. Once you get the vaccine, you are considered immune. If vaccines were truly effective, then why are there documented cases of outbreaks of illness among populations fully vaccinated? Why are booster shots necessary? The truth is that immunity from vaccines if far from perfect. So again I wonder, why are vaccines thought to be effective? Let’s examine some of the concepts in greater detail. Natural Immunity Versus Artificial Immunity Natural immunity differs quite a lot from the less effective artificial immunity. Natural immunity is when a person actually comes in contact with the disease. A total immune response is elicited, producing complete and lasting immunity. This is the most effective form of immunity possible. Artificial immunity is produced in the case of vaccines. Antibodies are produced. Protection is assumed. Artificial immunity is not lifelong, which is why booster shots are recommended. Antibodies Not Only Measure of Immunity The only reason vaccines are considered effective is if antibodies are produced when the vaccine is administered. Scientists are only beginning to understand immunity and the role of antibodies in immunity. Clearly, antibodies are not the sole factor in determining one’s immunity. We don’t yet know how immunity works completely, but pretending as though we do (which is what vaccines supporters are basically doing) is not helpful and could be potentially devastating. Protective Versus Effective When we call vaccines effective, what we really mean is that they are doing what they are designed to do, which is protect us from disease. This is their purpose. As stated above, vaccines are considered effective if they produce antibodies. If antibodies are present, a person is considered immune or protected. This is completely false, however. Research has proven it is absolutely possible for a person with antibodies to fall ill. If we judge a vaccine’s effectiveness on its ability to protect, then it fails miserably. It is also misleading to call a vaccine effective when it doesn’t do its job of protection. Immunizations Don’t call vaccinations immunizations. The two words are often used synonymously, but they are not the same thing! Vaccinations would have to produce immunity in every circumstance to earn the title immunizations. A person can be vaccinated, but not immune. Using these two words interchangeably is part of the brainwashing that goes on. Words can be powerful. Don’t fall for it. Outbreaks in Vaccinated Populations One of the clearest examples of the ineffectiveness of vaccines is when outbreaks occur in vaccinated populations. If vaccination produced immunity, then these outbreaks shouldn’t occur. Yet they do. Now don’t get confused with outbreaks occurring by strands not contained in a vaccine (as explained below), I am specifically referring to outbreaks occurring by strands in vaccines. In fact, vaccines can actually cause the disease they are supposed to be preventing. It happens all the time and is well documented. Different Strands of Disease A little known fact is that many of the vaccines do not contain every strand of virus or bacteria that produces a particular disease. HPV and Prevnar are two vaccines that come to mind instantly. In some cases, there are over a hundred different strands of a virus or bacteria that produces the disease. The HPV vaccine contains four strands and Prevnar has seven of the strands. Therefore, it is still possible to contract the illness from one of the many other strands out there. How’s that for effectiveness? |
| Copyright © 2010 TheHolisticParent.ORG . All rights reserved. |
| Follow Us On Facebook! |
| The Holistic Parent.ORG |